The Rise of Digital Gold
When Marcus launched his TikTok agency in 2023, he thought he’d stumbled onto a goldmine. His business model was simple: recruit creators, help them grow their accounts, negotiate brand deals, and take a 20-30% commission. Within six months, he was managing fifteen creators and pulling in $40,000 monthly. The money flowed like water.
His agency operated on multiple revenue streams. The biggest was brand partnerships—connecting his creators with companies willing to pay $5,000 to $50,000 per campaign. Then came the TikTok Creator Fund and Shop commissions, where creators earned money directly from the platform, and Marcus took his cut. He also charged some creators monthly retainer fees for account management, content strategy, and growth services. A few premium clients paid for his “full-service package”: filming, editing, posting, and even running their paid TikTok ads.
Marcus thought taxes would be straightforward. He was wrong.
The Tax Wake-Up Call
The trouble started when his accountant asked a simple question: “Are your creators employees or independent contractors?”
Marcus froze. He’d been treating everyone as independent contractors, issuing 1099 forms at year-end. But the accountant explained that the IRS doesn’t care what you call someone—they care about the actual relationship. Do you control when, where, and how they work? Do you provide their equipment? Can they work for competitors?
Some of Marcus’s creators were clearly independent. They built their own brands, worked with multiple agencies, and set their own schedules. Others operated under far tighter control. Marcus recruited them directly, assigned structured content calendars, required posts at specific times, supplied equipment like ring lights and backdrops, and restricted outside collaborations. From the IRS’s perspective, that level of oversight could reclassify them as employees—triggering payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation obligations that proper tax planning could have identified early.
The potential taxes, penalties, and interest could sink his business.
The Multi-State Nightmare
Then came issue number two: nexus. Marcus ran his agency from Texas, but his creators lived everywhere—California, New York, Florida, Georgia. When the California creator earned $100,000 in commissions and Marcus took his $25,000 cut, did that create tax obligations in California? His accountant said maybe.
Different states had different rules about economic nexus and where services were performed. California was particularly aggressive. If Marcus had employees there, stored equipment there, or conducted significant business activities there, he might owe California income tax—even though he’d never set foot in the state.
Sales tax was another landmine. When he charged his $2,000 monthly retainer for account management, was that a taxable service? It varied by state. Some states taxed digital services, some didn’t. Some taxed “influencer management” as a taxable service, others considered it non-taxable consulting.
The 1099 Trap
Marcus learned this the hard way during his first tax season. He’d paid dozens of freelancers throughout the year—video editors, graphic designers, photographers—often through PayPal or Venmo. Come January, he realized he needed to issue 1099-NEC forms to anyone he’d paid more than $600.
But he hadn’t collected W-9 forms from everyone. Some freelancers ghosted him when he asked for their tax information. Without their SSN or EIN, he couldn’t file the 1099s properly, which meant potential IRS penalties of $50 to $280 per missing form. Worse, without proper 1099s, he couldn’t deduct those payments as business expenses, potentially costing him thousands in extra taxes.
He also discovered that payments made via PayPal or Venmo for goods and services were now reported to the IRS on Form 1099-K. The platforms would report his transactions, and if his records didn’t match, it could trigger an audit.
The Creator Fund Complication
The TikTok Creator Fund payments created another headache. When his creators earned money directly from TikTok, then paid Marcus his commission, the tax treatment got messy. TikTok reported the full amount to the creator on a 1099-NEC. The creator then paid Marcus his percentage.
Could the creator deduct Marcus’s commission as a business expense? Yes—but only if they were operating as a business, not a hobby. The IRS hobby loss rule meant that if a creator wasn’t profitable or showing intent to be profitable, their deductions could be disallowed entirely.
Marcus needed to advise his creators to treat their TikTok work as a legitimate business: keep meticulous records, separate business and personal expenses, maintain a business bank account, and document their profit motive. Otherwise, both he and his creators could face tax problems.
The Brand Deal Breakdown
Brand partnerships created the most complex tax situations. When a brand paid Marcus’s agency $30,000 for a campaign, and Marcus paid his creator $21,000 (keeping $9,000), the question became: who reports what?
If the brand paid Marcus’s agency directly, Marcus needed to issue a 1099-NEC to the creator for the $21,000. The agency would report $30,000 in revenue and deduct $21,000 as contractor payments, netting $9,000 in taxable income.
But sometimes brands wanted to pay the creator directly, with Marcus invoicing separately for his commission. This was cleaner for everyone—the creator got their 1099 from the brand, Marcus got his 1099 for the commission. But it required clear contracts spelling out payment terms.
The worst scenario was when brands paid creators in product instead of cash. A $10,000 worth of free merchandise was still taxable income to the creator. If Marcus took his 20% commission, the creator owed taxes on $10,000 of income but only had product—no cash to pay Marcus or the IRS. These deals often ended badly.

The Audit
Two years in, Marcus got the letter every business owner dreads: IRS audit notice. They wanted to examine his worker classification, his 1099 reporting, and his deductions for three tax years.
The auditor discovered several problems. Three of his “contractors” should have been classified as employees—Marcus owed back payroll taxes plus penalties. He’d deducted 100% of his home office despite using it only 60% for business—he owed money back. He’d written off a “business trip” to Miami that was clearly personal—more money owed.
But the biggest hit came from misclassified meal and entertainment expenses. Marcus had deducted 100% of dinners with creators and brands, thinking they were fully deductible business meetings. The auditor explained that meals were only 50% deductible, even when discussing business. His $30,000 in meal deductions got cut to $15,000, increasing his tax bill significantly.
The audit cost him $47,000 in back taxes, penalties, and interest, plus another $15,000 in accountant and attorney fees. It almost destroyed his business.
The Lessons Learned
Marcus rebuilt, but smarter. He implemented strict policies:
Worker Classification: He used a clear test. If he controlled how, when, and where someone worked, they were an employee. If they had autonomy, worked for multiple clients, and provided their own tools, they were contractors. No more gray areas.
Upfront Documentation: Every contractor signed a detailed agreement and submitted a W-9 before receiving their first payment. No W-9, no payment—no exceptions.
Multi-State Compliance: He hired a specialist to determine where he had nexus and registered in those states. Yes, it was expensive and complicated, but cheaper than penalties and back taxes.
Sales Tax Registration: He registered for sales tax permits in states where his services were taxable and collected the appropriate amounts.
Separate Entities: He formed an LLC for liability protection and elected S-corporation status for tax efficiency. This allowed him to pay himself a reasonable salary (subject to payroll taxes) and take the rest as distributions (not subject to self-employment tax), saving him thousands annually.
Quarterly Estimated Taxes: Instead of getting slammed with a huge bill in April, he paid estimated taxes quarterly based on his projected income. This avoided underpayment penalties and helped with cash flow planning.
Meticulous Records: Every expense got documented with receipts, notes about the business purpose, and proper categorization. He used accounting software that synced with his bank accounts, making record-keeping automatic.
Professional Guidance: He kept his accountant on retainer, checking in quarterly instead of just at tax time. This allowed him to catch issues early and make strategic decisions throughout the year.
The New Reality
By year four, Marcus had built a seven-figure agency representing fifty creators. But he also had a full-time bookkeeper, a payroll service, a multi-state tax specialist, and a business attorney. His tax preparation alone cost $12,000 annually—but it was worth every penny.
He’d learned that in the TikTok agency business, the money comes fast, but the tax obligations come faster. The agencies that survive aren’t necessarily the ones with the biggest creators or the best content strategies—they’re the ones that respect the tax code, classify workers correctly, document everything, and plan ahead.
The wild west days of influencer marketing were over. The IRS had noticed that billions of dollars flowed through creator economies, and they wanted their share. The agencies that treated taxes as an afterthought didn’t last. The ones that built compliance into their business model from day one were the ones still standing when the dust settled.
Marcus’s advice to new agency owners was simple: Hire a good accountant before you hire your first creator. The money you spend on tax planning will save you ten times that in penalties, interest, and sleepless nights. In this business, you can survive losing a client or a brand deal. You can’t survive the IRS deciding you’ve been doing taxes wrong for three years.
The TikTok agency game was lucrative, but only for those who played by the rules.
_______________
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Every business situation is unique, and you should consult with qualified professionals regarding your specific circumstances.